Core i5-750 vs FX-7600P

Core i5-750 vs FX-7600P Performance Spectrum

Core i5-750

4 / 4

2,546

0.0%

2,557

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-750 vs FX-7600P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-750 vs FX-7600P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-750

2009

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-7600P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-7600P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,546 vs 2,557).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($210 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

FX-7600P

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $60 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
✅Delivers 40.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.0 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $210 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-750.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-7600P better than Core i5-750?

Yes. FX-7600P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-7600P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-7600P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-7600P is the better buy right now. FX-7600P comes in $60 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $210 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 40.6% better value on MSRP (17.0 vs 12.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-7600P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-750 vs FX-7600P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-750

The Core i5-750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,546 points. Launch price was $150.

FX-7600P

The FX-7600P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,557 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-750 and FX-7600P share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-750 versus 3.6 GHz on the FX-7600P — a 11.8% clock advantage for the FX-7600P (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i5-750 uses the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the FX-7600P uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-750 scores 2,546 against the FX-7600P's 2,557 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-7600P.

Feature	Core i5-750	FX-7600P
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.66 GHz	2.7 GHz+2%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Lynnfield (2009−2010)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	2,546	2,557
Geekbench 6 Single	424	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-750 uses the LGA1156 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-7600P uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-750	FX-7600P
Socket	LGA1156	FP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-750) / not specified (FX-7600P). Primary use case: Core i5-750 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-750 rivals Phenom II X4 965.

Feature	Core i5-750	FX-7600P
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-750 was priced at $210, while the FX-7600P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($210 vs $150), FX-7600P was $60 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-750 delivers 12.1 pts/$ vs 17.0 pts/$ for the FX-7600P — making the FX-7600P the 33.8% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-750	FX-7600P
MSRP	$210	$150-29%
Performance per Dollar	12.1	17.0+40%
Release Date	2009	2014

Search Core i5-750 on Amazon

Search FX-7600P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.