Core i5-7Y54
VS
3015e

Core i5-7Y54 vs 3015e

Intel

Core i5-7Y54

2 Cores4 Thrd4.5 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2016
VS
AMD

3015e

2 Cores4 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-7Y54 is positioned at rank 1101 and the 3015e is on rank 416, so the 3015e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7Y54

#1089
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3189%
#1090
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3142%
#1091
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2885%
#1092
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2872%
#1093
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2845%
#1095
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2748%
#1096
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2635%
#1097
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2630%
#1098
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2560%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
100%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#1107
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
96%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
95%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
94%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
94%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar 3015e

#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
99%
#404
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
560%
#405
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
552%
#406
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
507%
#407
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
505%
#408
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
500%
#410
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
483%
#411
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
463%
#412
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
462%
#413
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
450%
#416
3015e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
99%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The 3015e (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-7Y543015e
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Pollock (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-7Y54 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-7Y543015e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-7Y54 and 3015e

Intel

Core i5-7Y54

The Core i5-7Y54 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,586 points. Launch price was $281.

AMD

3015e

The 3015e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,618 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-7Y54 and 3015e share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i5-7Y54 versus 2.3 GHz on the 3015e — a 32.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-7Y54 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i5-7Y54 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the 3015e uses Pollock (Zen) (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-7Y54 scores 2,586 against the 3015e's 2,618 — a 1.2% lead for the 3015e. Both processors carry 4 MB of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-7Y543015e
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+39%
2.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Pollock (Zen) (2020)
PassMark
2,586
2,618+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
900
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-7Y54 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the 3015e uses FT5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-7Y54 versus 1600 on the 3015e — the 3015e supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-7Y54) vs 1 (3015e). PCIe lanes: 10 (Core i5-7Y54) vs 8 (3015e) — the Core i5-7Y54 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core i5-7Y54) and FT5 (3015e).

FeatureCore i5-7Y543015e
Socket
FCBGA1515
FT5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR3-1866
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+104857500%
16
RAM Channels
2+100%
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10+25%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7Y54) vs true (3015e). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core i5-7Y54) and Vega 3 (3015e) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7Y54 targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: 3015e rivals Celeron N4120.

FeatureCore i5-7Y543015e
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 615
Vega 3
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Tablet/2-in-1