Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i7-4610M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-L16G7

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Core i7-4610M needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4610M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i7-4610M

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,280).
❌7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-L16G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-L16G7

2020

Core i7-4610M

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 7W instead of 512W, a 505W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (9 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Core i7-4610M needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4610M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,251 vs 3,280).
❌7214.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-L16G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-L16G7 better than Core i7-4610M?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-4610M is ahead with a 5.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-L16G7 pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-L16G7 is the better fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 5 cores and 5 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-L16G7 still looks like the safer overall buy. Core i5-L16G7 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-L16G7 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 5 cores / 5 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-L16G7 Benchmark Check

Core i7-4610M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-L16G7	Core i7-4610M
1080p
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	79 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	66 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	65 FPS	70 FPS
medium	56 FPS	59 FPS
high	43 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i5-L16G7 Open Core i7-4610M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-L16G7	Core i7-4610M
1080p
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	76 FPS	81 FPS
high	71 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	66 FPS	81 FPS
medium	59 FPS	81 FPS
high	48 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	41 FPS

Open Core i5-L16G7 Open Core i7-4610M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-L16G7	Core i7-4610M
1080p
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	81 FPS

Open Core i5-L16G7 Open Core i7-4610M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-L16G7	Core i7-4610M
1080p
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	81 FPS
1440p
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	82 FPS	81 FPS
medium	82 FPS	81 FPS
high	82 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	81 FPS

Open Core i5-L16G7 Open Core i7-4610M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-L16G7 and Core i7-4610M

Core i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.

Core i7-4610M

The Core i7-4610M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-L16G7 packs 5 cores / 5 threads, while the Core i7-4610M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 versus 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-4610M — a 20.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-4610M (base: 1.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-L16G7 uses the Lakefield (2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i7-4610M uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-L16G7 scores 3,280 against the Core i7-4610M's 3,251 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-L16G7. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-L16G7	Core i7-4610M
Cores / Threads	5 / 5+150%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3.7 GHz+23%
Base Clock	1.4 GHz	3 GHz+114%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	10 nm-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Lakefield (2020)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,280	3,251

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-L16G7 uses the FC-CSP1016 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4610M uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-L16G7	Core i7-4610M
Socket	FC-CSP1016	PGA946
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR4x-4267	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	9	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-L16G7) / not specified (Core i7-4610M). The Core i5-L16G7 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Core i7-4610M requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile.