PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-10510U vs Xeon E3-1245 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-10510U vs Xeon E3-1245 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-10510U

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 15W instead of 77W, a 62W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.7 vs 23.3 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $273 MSRP).

Xeon E3-1245 v2

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $136 less on MSRP ($273 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
✅Delivers 48.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.3 vs 15.7 PassMark/$ ($273 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10510U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,273 vs 3,300).
❌413.3% higher power demand at 77W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-10510U better than Xeon E3-1245 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1245 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-10510U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-10510U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 14.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-10510U is the stronger fit. You are getting 45.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-10510U is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E3-1245 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-10510U comes in 49.8% more expensive on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $273 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1245 v2 is also 48.6% better value on MSRP (23.3 vs 15.7 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-10510U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-10510U vs Xeon E3-1245 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10510U

The Core i7-10510U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,408 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon E3-1245 v2

The Xeon E3-1245 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 May 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,357 points. Launch price was $462.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-10510U and Xeon E3-1245 v2 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-10510U versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v2 — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-10510U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-10510U uses the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10510U scores 6,408 against the Xeon E3-1245 v2's 6,357 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-10510U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,300 vs 659, a 65.4% lead for the Core i7-10510U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,300 vs 2,273 (36.9% advantage for the Core i7-10510U). Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-10510U	Xeon E3-1245 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+29%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3.4 GHz+89%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	6,408	6,357
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,866	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,300+97%	659
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,300+45%	2,273

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-10510U uses the FCBGA1528 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-10510U versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1245 v2 — the Core i7-10510U supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-10510U supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: 400-series (Core i7-10510U) and Intel C202,Intel C204,Intel C206,Intel C216 (Xeon E3-1245 v2).

Feature	Core i7-10510U	Xeon E3-1245 v2
Socket	FCBGA1528	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666+67%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10510U) vs Yes (Xeon E3-1245 v2). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i7-10510U) and HD Graphics P4000 (Xeon E3-1245 v2) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10510U targets Productivity, Xeon E3-1245 v2 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i7-10510U rivals Ryzen 7 3700U.

Feature	Core i7-10510U	Xeon E3-1245 v2
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics	HD Graphics P4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes
Target Use	Productivity	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-10510U was priced at $409, while the Xeon E3-1245 v2 came in at $273. On launch pricing ($409 vs $273), Xeon E3-1245 v2 was $136 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10510U delivers 15.7 pts/$ vs 23.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1245 v2 — making the Xeon E3-1245 v2 the 39.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-10510U	Xeon E3-1245 v2
MSRP	$409	$273-33%
Performance per Dollar	15.7	23.3+48%
Release Date	2019	2012

Search Core i7-10510U on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1245 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.