
Core i7-10700

Xeon W-11865MLE
Core i7-10700 vs Xeon W-11865MLE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-10700 vs Xeon W-11865MLE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-10700 vs Xeon W-11865MLE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-10700
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +15.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $102 less on MSRP ($365 MSRP vs $467 MSRP).
- β Delivers 29.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.0 vs 34.1 PassMark/$ ($365 MSRP vs $467 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD 630, while Xeon W-11865MLE needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
- β160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
Xeon W-11865MLE
2021Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
- β Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-10700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (15,917 vs 16,067).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 34.1 vs 44.0 PassMark/$ ($467 MSRP vs $365 MSRP).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-10700 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-10700.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-10700 better than Xeon W-11865MLE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-10700 vs Xeon W-11865MLE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-10700
The Core i7-10700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,067 points. Launch price was $340.

Xeon W-11865MLE
The Xeon W-11865MLE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 August 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,917 points. Launch price was $467.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-10700 and Xeon W-11865MLE share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i7-10700 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon W-11865MLE β a 6.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i7-10700 uses the Comet Lake (2020β2025) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-10700 scores 16,067 against the Xeon W-11865MLE's 15,917 β a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-10700. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11865MLE.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+7% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+93% | 1.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+20380% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Comet Lake (2020β2025) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 16,067 | 15,917 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,250 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,597 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,926 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-10700 uses the LGA1200 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-11865MLE uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1200 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2933 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-10700) / not specified (Xeon W-11865MLE). The Core i7-10700 includes integrated graphics (UHD 630), while the Xeon W-11865MLE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700 rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD 630 | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Gaming | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-10700 was priced at $365, while the Xeon W-11865MLE came in at $467. On launch pricing ($365 vs $467), Core i7-10700 was $102 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-10700 delivers 44.0 pts/$ vs 34.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11865MLE β making the Core i7-10700 the 25.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-10700 | Xeon W-11865MLE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $365-22% | $467 |
| Performance per Dollar | 44.0+29% | 34.1 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














