
Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:

Core i9-12900F
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i9-12900F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Core i9-12900F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,873 vs 45,784).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700K
2022Core i9-12900F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 72.6 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $494 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Core i9-12900F needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,873 vs 45,784).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 72.6 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($494 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i9-12900F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 284 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 223 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 190 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 689 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 580 FPS | 526 FPS |
| high | 484 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 399 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 441 FPS | 397 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 340 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 348 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 530 FPS | 619 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 491 FPS | 560 FPS |
| high | 427 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 371 FPS | 416 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 498 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 339 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 319 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 970 FPS | 894 FPS |
| medium | 883 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 766 FPS | 696 FPS |
| ultra | 689 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 829 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 740 FPS | 681 FPS |
| high | 642 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 566 FPS | 517 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 567 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 515 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 463 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Core i9-12900F

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Core i9-12900F
Core i9-12900F
The Core i9-12900F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 35,873 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-13700K and Core i9-12900F share an identical 16-core/24-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-12900F — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700K uses the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-12900F uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Core i9-12900F's 35,873 — a 24.3% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Both processors carry 30 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24 | 16 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+60% | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 45,784+28% | 35,873 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 31,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,846 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 18,980 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 5.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 4800 on the Core i9-12900F — the Core i9-12900F supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700K supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and Z690,B660 (Core i9-12900F).
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-12900F). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i9-12900F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Core i9-12900F rivals Ryzen 9 5900X.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Core i9-12900F debuted at $494. On MSRP ($409 vs $494), the Core i7-13700K is $85 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 72.6 pts/$ for the Core i9-12900F — making the Core i7-13700K the 42.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700K | Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $409-17% | $494 |
| Performance per Dollar | 111.9+54% | 72.6 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













