PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,485 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 498.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130H, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Core i7-13700K

2022

Xeon Gold 6130H

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +40.3% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).
✅Costs $1,485 less on MSRP ($409 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Delivers 498.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 111.9 vs 18.7 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $1,894 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCLGA3647 and DDR4.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6130H, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (35,440 vs 45,784).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 30 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.7 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($1,894 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on FCLGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700K moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700K better than Xeon Gold 6130H?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6130H makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-13700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-13700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 40.3% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700K is the better fit. You are getting 29.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-13700K is $1,485 cheaper on MSRP at $409 MSRP versus $1,894 MSRP, and it gives you a 40.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 498.2% better value on MSRP (111.9 vs 18.7 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-13700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCLGA3647, 36.4% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 22 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 24 threads instead of 16/32. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-13700K Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6130H Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	284 FPS	182 FPS
medium	268 FPS	146 FPS
high	223 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	190 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	144 FPS
medium	200 FPS	114 FPS
high	159 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	159 FPS	67 FPS
medium	134 FPS	56 FPS
high	103 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	689 FPS	211 FPS
medium	580 FPS	186 FPS
high	484 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	135 FPS
1440p
low	595 FPS	182 FPS
medium	525 FPS	165 FPS
high	441 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	348 FPS	118 FPS
medium	314 FPS	107 FPS
high	295 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	261 FPS	81 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	648 FPS	697 FPS
medium	530 FPS	559 FPS
high	467 FPS	507 FPS
ultra	405 FPS	439 FPS
1440p
low	591 FPS	558 FPS
medium	491 FPS	453 FPS
high	427 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	371 FPS	355 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	405 FPS
medium	374 FPS	315 FPS
high	339 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	225 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Gold 6130H

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Gold 6130H
1080p
low	970 FPS	848 FPS
medium	883 FPS	771 FPS
high	766 FPS	666 FPS
ultra	689 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	829 FPS	684 FPS
medium	740 FPS	600 FPS
high	642 FPS	516 FPS
ultra	566 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	567 FPS	471 FPS
medium	515 FPS	423 FPS
high	463 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	327 FPS

Open Core i7-13700K Open Xeon Gold 6130H

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700K and Xeon Gold 6130H

Core i7-13700K

The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.

Xeon Gold 6130H

The Xeon Gold 6130H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCLGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 35,440 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700K packs 16 cores / 24 threads, matching the Xeon Gold 6130H's 16 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6130H — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-13700K is built on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-13700K scores 45,784 against the Xeon Gold 6130H's 35,440 — a 25.5% lead for the Core i7-13700K. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6130H.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Gold 6130H
Cores / Threads	16 / 24	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+46%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+62%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)+36%	22 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)	—
PassMark	45,784+29%	35,440
Cinebench R23 Multi	31,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,846	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	18,980	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700K uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6130H uses FCLGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-13700K versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6130H — the Xeon Gold 6130H supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6130H supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700K) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6130H). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-13700K) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6130H) — the Xeon Gold 6130H offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6130H).

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Gold 6130H
Socket	LGA1700	FCLGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	2666+53220%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+26214300%	768
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6130H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-13700K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6130H). The Core i7-13700K includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6130H requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X; Xeon Gold 6130H rivals EPYC 7401.

Feature	Core i7-13700K	Xeon Gold 6130H
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-13700K launched at $409 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6130H debuted at $1894. On MSRP ($409 vs $1894), the Core i7-13700K is $1485 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700K delivers 111.9 pts/$ vs 18.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6130H — making the Core i7-13700K the 142.7% better value option.