PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-14700HX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 130W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Xeon E7-8857 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8857 v2, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E7-8857 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (36,304 vs 37,173).
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,838 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌136.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i7-14700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.

Core i7-14700HX

2024

Xeon E7-8857 v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 55W instead of 130W, a 75W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Xeon E7-8857 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 12 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8857 v2, which brings 12 cores / 12 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (36,304 vs 37,173).
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,838 MSRP, while Core i7-14700HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌136.4% higher power demand at 130W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i7-14700HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-14700HX better than Xeon E7-8857 v2?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E7-8857 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-14700HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-14700HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 16.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-14700HX is the better fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 20 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-14700HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E7-8857 v2 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i7-14700HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $3,838 MSRP, and it gives you a 16.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E7-8857 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-14700HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2014), a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, more multi-core headroom with 20 cores / 28 threads instead of 12/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-14700HX Benchmark Check

Xeon E7-8857 v2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-14700HX	Xeon E7-8857 v2
1080p
low	315 FPS	178 FPS
medium	307 FPS	142 FPS
high	244 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	204 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	273 FPS	145 FPS
medium	236 FPS	113 FPS
high	175 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	187 FPS	67 FPS
medium	160 FPS	56 FPS
high	119 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	107 FPS	35 FPS

Open Core i7-14700HX Open Xeon E7-8857 v2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-14700HX	Xeon E7-8857 v2
1080p
low	350 FPS	328 FPS
medium	299 FPS	288 FPS
high	251 FPS	241 FPS
ultra	228 FPS	195 FPS
1440p
low	304 FPS	287 FPS
medium	270 FPS	258 FPS
high	229 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	174 FPS
4K
low	179 FPS	188 FPS
medium	163 FPS	169 FPS
high	155 FPS	145 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	114 FPS

Open Core i7-14700HX Open Xeon E7-8857 v2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-14700HX	Xeon E7-8857 v2
1080p
low	647 FPS	908 FPS
medium	529 FPS	786 FPS
high	466 FPS	744 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	660 FPS
1440p
low	590 FPS	742 FPS
medium	490 FPS	622 FPS
high	426 FPS	589 FPS
ultra	370 FPS	520 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	467 FPS
medium	373 FPS	365 FPS
high	338 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	289 FPS	260 FPS

Open Core i7-14700HX Open Xeon E7-8857 v2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-14700HX	Xeon E7-8857 v2
1080p
low	924 FPS	908 FPS
medium	841 FPS	901 FPS
high	725 FPS	767 FPS
ultra	651 FPS	649 FPS
1440p
low	778 FPS	839 FPS
medium	694 FPS	718 FPS
high	599 FPS	607 FPS
ultra	528 FPS	507 FPS
4K
low	549 FPS	581 FPS
medium	499 FPS	508 FPS
high	445 FPS	445 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	376 FPS

Open Core i7-14700HX Open Xeon E7-8857 v2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-14700HX and Xeon E7-8857 v2

Core i7-14700HX

The Core i7-14700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 37,173 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon E7-8857 v2

The Xeon E7-8857 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 36,304 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-14700HX packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon E7-8857 v2 offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-14700HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700HX versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 — a 40% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700HX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-14700HX is built on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-14700HX scores 37,173 against the Xeon E7-8857 v2's 36,304 — a 2.4% lead for the Core i7-14700HX. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700HX vs 30 MB on the Xeon E7-8857 v2.

Feature	Core i7-14700HX	Xeon E7-8857 v2
Cores / Threads	20 / 28+67%	12 / 12
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+50%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3 GHz+43%
L3 Cache	33 MB (total)+10%	30 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024)	—
PassMark	37,173+2%	36,304
Geekbench 6 Single	2,871	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	17,358	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-14700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-8857 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700HX versus 1600 on the Xeon E7-8857 v2 — the Xeon E7-8857 v2 supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-8857 v2 supports up to 1536 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700HX) vs 4 (Xeon E7-8857 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700HX) vs 40 (Xeon E7-8857 v2) — the Xeon E7-8857 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-14700HX) and C602J (Xeon E7-8857 v2).

Feature	Core i7-14700HX	Xeon E7-8857 v2
Socket	FCBGA1964	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0	PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	1600+31900%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+13107100%	1536
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-14700HX has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i7-14700HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-14700HX includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon E7-8857 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Xeon E7-8857 v2 rivals Xeon E7-4850 v2.