Core i7-2620M
VS
Core 2 Duo P7550

Core i7-2620M vs Core 2 Duo P7550

Intel

Core i7-2620M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo P7550

2 Cores2 Thrd3 WWMax: 2.26 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2620M is positioned at rank 1162 and the Core 2 Duo P7550 is on rank 192, so the Core 2 Duo P7550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2620M

#1149
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4185%
#1150
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4124%
#1151
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3786%
#1152
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3769%
#1153
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3734%
#1155
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3606%
#1156
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3458%
#1157
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3452%
#1158
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3359%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1163
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
98%
#1164
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1165
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1166
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
97%
#1169
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#1170
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1171
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1172
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#1173
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
95%
#1175
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
93%
#1176
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P7550

#180
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
361%
#181
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
356%
#182
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
326%
#183
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
325%
#184
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
322%
#186
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
311%
#187
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
298%
#188
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
298%
#189
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
290%
#192
Core 2 Duo P7550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#193
Atom N475
MSRP: $75|Avg: N/A
100%
#194
Pentium Gold 4417U
MSRP: $161|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-2620M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core 2 Duo P7550 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2620MCore 2 Duo P7550
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2620MCore 2 Duo P7550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($346)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2620M and Core 2 Duo P7550

Intel

Core i7-2620M

The Core i7-2620M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,424 points. Launch price was $346.

Intel

Core 2 Duo P7550

The Core 2 Duo P7550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.26 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,439 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2620M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo P7550's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-2620M versus 2.26 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P7550 — a 40.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-2620M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Core i7-2620M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P7550 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2620M scores 2,424 against the Core 2 Duo P7550's 2,439 — a 0.6% lead for the Core 2 Duo P7550. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2620M vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P7550.

FeatureCore i7-2620MCore 2 Duo P7550
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+50%
2.26 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+19%
2.26 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
512 kB
3 MB+500%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
2,424
2,439
Geekbench 6 Single
509
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,222
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2620M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo P7550 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2620MCore 2 Duo P7550
Socket
PGA988
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-2620M) / not specified (Core 2 Duo P7550). The Core i7-2620M includes integrated graphics (HD 3000), while the Core 2 Duo P7550 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2620M targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-2620M rivals Core i5-2410M.

FeatureCore i7-2620MCore 2 Duo P7550
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget