Core i7-2635QM
VS
Athlon II X4 651

Core i7-2635QM vs Athlon II X4 651

Intel

Core i7-2635QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 651

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2635QM is positioned at rank 1096 and the Athlon II X4 651 is on rank 505, so the Athlon II X4 651 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2635QM

#1084
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3131%
#1085
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3085%
#1086
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2832%
#1087
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2820%
#1088
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2794%
#1090
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2698%
#1091
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2587%
#1092
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2583%
#1093
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2513%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
100%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 651

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8001%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7560%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5489%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1654%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1310%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1146%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
656%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
648%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
590%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
590%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
583%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
567%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
559%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
557%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
552%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
100%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
99%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
100%
#510
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#514
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
98%
#517
Pentium G2030T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#518
Athlon X4 730
MSRP: $60|Avg: $52
97%
#519
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X4 651 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2635QM in both compute-intensive tasks (1.2% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2635QMAthlon II X4 651
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($92)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II X4 651 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 76% cheaper ($92 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-2635QMAthlon II X4 651
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+316%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($92)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2635QM and Athlon II X4 651

Intel

Core i7-2635QM

The Core i7-2635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,541 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

Athlon II X4 651

The Athlon II X4 651 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,584 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2635QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Athlon II X4 651's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2635QM versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X4 651 — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 651 (base: 2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-2635QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X4 651 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2635QM scores 3,541 against the Athlon II X4 651's 3,584 — a 1.2% lead for the Athlon II X4 651. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2635QM vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 651.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMAthlon II X4 651
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
3,541
3,584+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2635QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 651 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMAthlon II X4 651
Socket
FCBGA1224
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i7-2635QM) / not specified (Athlon II X4 651). The Core i7-2635QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Athlon II X4 651 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2635QM targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMAthlon II X4 651
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-2635QM launched at $378 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 651 debuted at $92.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMAthlon II X4 651
MSRP
$378
$92-76%
Avg Price (30d)
$92
Release Date
2011
2011