Core i7-2635QM
VS
Pentium Dual Core T3200

Core i7-2635QM vs Pentium Dual Core T3200

Intel

Core i7-2635QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3200

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2635QM is positioned at rank 1096 and the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is on rank 375, so the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2635QM

#1084
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3131%
#1085
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3085%
#1086
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2832%
#1087
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2820%
#1088
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2794%
#1090
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2698%
#1091
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2587%
#1092
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2583%
#1093
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2513%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
100%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
98%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T3200

#363
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
522%
#364
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
514%
#365
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
472%
#366
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
470%
#367
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
465%
#369
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
449%
#370
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
431%
#371
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
430%
#372
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
419%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-2635QM leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2635QMPentium Dual Core T3200
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium Dual Core T3200 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 99% cheaper ($5 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-2635QMPentium Dual Core T3200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+7586%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2635QM and Pentium Dual Core T3200

Intel

Core i7-2635QM

The Core i7-2635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,541 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3200

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2635QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-2635QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2635QM versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-2635QM. The Core i7-2635QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2635QM scores 3,541 against the Pentium Dual Core T3200's 3,600 — a 1.7% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3200.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMPentium Dual Core T3200
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+45%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
3,541
3,600+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
235
Geekbench 6 Multi
408
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2635QM versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — the Core i7-2635QM supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-2635QM supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2635QM) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) — the Core i7-2635QM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMPentium Dual Core T3200
Socket
FCBGA1224
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+300%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-2635QM) vs No (Pentium Dual Core T3200). The Core i7-2635QM includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2635QM targets Mobile.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMPentium Dual Core T3200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
No
Target Use
Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-2635QM launched at $378 MSRP, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 debuted at $64.

FeatureCore i7-2635QMPentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP
$378
$64-83%
Avg Price (30d)
$5
Release Date
2011
2008