Core i7-2635QM vs Core i7-2630QM

Core i7-2635QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011

Core i7-2630QM

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-2635QM

4 / 8

3,541

0.0%

3,550

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2635QM is positioned at rank 1096 and the Core i7-2630QM is on rank 1094, so the Core i7-2630QM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2635QM

#1084

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3131%

#1085

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3085%

#1086

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2832%

#1087

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

2820%

#1088

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

2794%

#1090

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2698%

#1091

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2587%

#1092

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2583%

#1093

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2513%

#1096

Core i7-2635QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

100%

#1097

Celeron 877

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

100%

#1098

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

MSRP: $134|Avg: $50

100%

#1099

Core i5-3337U

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

99%

#1100

Core i5-2450M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

99%

#1101

Core i5-7Y57

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

98%

#1102

Core i5-7Y54

MSRP: $281|Avg: $100

98%

#1104

Pentium 997

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

97%

#1105

Pentium A1018

MSRP: $132|Avg: $15

96%

#1106

Core i5-2430M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

96%

#1108

Pentium Dual Core T4500

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

95%

#1109

Celeron B820

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

95%

#1110

Pentium B980

MSRP: $125|Avg: $35

94%

#1111

Celeron 867

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2630QM

#1082

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3125%

#1083

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3079%

#1084

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2826%

#1085

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

2814%

#1086

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

2788%

#1088

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2692%

#1089

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2581%

#1090

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2577%

#1091

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2508%

#1094

Core i7-2630QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

100%

#1096

Core i7-2635QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

100%

#1097

Celeron 877

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

100%

#1098

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

MSRP: $134|Avg: $50

99%

#1099

Core i5-3337U

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

99%

#1100

Core i5-2450M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

98%

#1101

Core i5-7Y54

MSRP: $281|Avg: $100

98%

#1102

Core i5-7Y57

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

98%

#1104

Pentium 997

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

97%

#1105

Pentium A1018

MSRP: $132|Avg: $15

96%

#1106

Core i5-2430M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

95%

#1108

Pentium Dual Core T4500

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

95%

#1109

Celeron B820

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Core i7-2630QM shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.

Insight	Core i7-2635QM	Core i7-2630QM
Gaming	Balanced gaming performance	Balanced gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-2630QM stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 0% cheaper ($378 vs $378) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Core i7-2635QM	Core i7-2630QM
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+0%)
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-2635QM Benchmark Check

Core i7-2630QM Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2635QM and Core i7-2630QM

Core i7-2635QM

The Core i7-2635QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1224. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,541 points. Launch price was $378.

Core i7-2630QM

The Core i7-2630QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,550 points. Launch price was $378.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2635QM and Core i7-2630QM share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2635QM versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2630QM — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture using a 32 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-2635QM scores 3,541 against the Core i7-2630QM's 3,550 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-2630QM. Both processors carry 6 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-2635QM	Core i7-2630QM
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	6 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	3,541	3,550

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2635QM uses the FCBGA1224 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2630QM uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2635QM versus 1600 on the Core i7-2630QM — the Core i7-2630QM supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-2630QM supports up to 32 of RAM compared to 16 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Core i7-2635QM	Core i7-2630QM
Socket	FCBGA1224	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+52428700%	32
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core i7-2635QM) vs true (Core i7-2630QM). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2635QM) and Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2630QM) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2635QM targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core i7-2630QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX.