Core i7-2657M
VS
Core i3-4330

Core i7-2657M vs Core i3-4330

Intel

Core i7-2657M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-4330

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2657M is positioned at rank 268 and the Core i3-4330 is on rank 687, so the Core i7-2657M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2657M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#256
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
420%
#257
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
414%
#258
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
380%
#259
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
378%
#260
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
375%
#262
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
362%
#263
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
347%
#264
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
347%
#265
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
337%
#268
Core i7-2657M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4330

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12355%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11674%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8476%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2554%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2023%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1769%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1013%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1000%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
911%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
911%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
900%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
876%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
864%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
860%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
853%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
98%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#692
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
98%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
98%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
98%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
97%
#696
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#697
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
96%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-4330 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2657M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2657MCore i3-4330
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2657MCore i3-4330
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($60)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2657M and Core i3-4330

Intel

Core i7-2657M

The Core i7-2657M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,491 points. Launch price was $317.

Intel

Core i3-4330

The Core i3-4330 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,482 points. Launch price was $171.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2657M and Core i3-4330 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i7-2657M versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i3-4330 — a 25.8% clock advantage for the Core i3-4330 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-2657M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4330 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2657M scores 3,491 against the Core i3-4330's 3,482 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-2657M. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2657M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4330.

FeatureCore i7-2657MCore i3-4330
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz+30%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.5 GHz+119%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,491
3,482
Geekbench 6 Single
535
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2657M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4330 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i3-4330 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-2657MCore i3-4330
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2657M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4330). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2657M) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4330) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2657M targets Ultrabook, Core i3-4330 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2657M rivals A6-3420M.

FeatureCore i7-2657MCore i3-4330
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Ultrabook
Desktop