Core i7-2657M
VS
A10-7870K

Core i7-2657M vs A10-7870K

Intel

Core i7-2657M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A10-7870K

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2657M is positioned at rank 268 and the A10-7870K is on rank 368, so the Core i7-2657M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2657M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#256
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
420%
#257
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
414%
#258
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
380%
#259
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
378%
#260
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
375%
#262
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
362%
#263
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
347%
#264
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
347%
#265
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
337%
#268
Core i7-2657M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7870K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5335%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5041%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3660%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1103%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
873%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
764%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
438%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
432%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
393%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
393%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
389%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
378%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
373%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
372%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
368%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
100%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
100%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
99%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
98%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
97%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
96%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
95%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
95%
#368
A10-7870K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#378
Ryzen 5 1600
MSRP: $219|Avg: $144
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A10-7870K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-2657M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-2657MA10-7870K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2657MA10-7870K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2657M and A10-7870K

Intel

Core i7-2657M

The Core i7-2657M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,491 points. Launch price was $317.

AMD

A10-7870K

The A10-7870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 28 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $120.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2657M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-7870K offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7870K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i7-2657M versus 4.1 GHz on the A10-7870K — a 41.2% clock advantage for the A10-7870K (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-2657M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A10-7870K uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2657M scores 3,491 against the A10-7870K's 3,506 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-7870K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 535 vs 550, a 2.8% lead for the A10-7870K that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2657M vs 0 kB on the A10-7870K.

FeatureCore i7-2657MA10-7870K
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
4.1 GHz+52%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.9 GHz+144%
L3 Cache
4 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
4096 kB+700%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark
3,491
3,506
Geekbench 6 Single
535
550+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2657M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-7870K uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The A10-7870K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2657M) and A55,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-7870K).

FeatureCore i7-2657MA10-7870K
Socket
BGA1023
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-2133
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-7870K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2657M) vs AMD-V (A10-7870K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2657M) and Radeon R7 (A10-7870K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2657M targets Ultrabook, A10-7870K targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-2657M rivals A6-3420M; A10-7870K rivals Core i3-4370.

FeatureCore i7-2657MA10-7870K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Ultrabook
Budget