Core i7-2657M
VS
Core i3-4340

Core i7-2657M vs Core i3-4340

Intel

Core i7-2657M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-4340

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2657M is positioned at rank 268 and the Core i3-4340 is on rank 716, so the Core i7-2657M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2657M

#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
100%
#256
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
420%
#257
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
414%
#258
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
380%
#259
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
378%
#260
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
375%
#262
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
362%
#263
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
347%
#264
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
347%
#265
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
337%
#268
Core i7-2657M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4340

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
13310%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12576%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9132%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2751%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2179%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1906%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1092%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1078%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
981%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
981%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
970%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
944%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
931%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
927%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
919%
#716
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
100%
#717
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
100%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
100%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
100%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
100%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
99%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
99%
#723
Core i3-4130T
MSRP: $124|Avg: $10
99%
#724
Celeron E3300
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
99%
#725
Core i7-6700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $60
99%
#726
Core i7-4790K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $93
98%
#727
Celeron E3400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $15
98%
#728
FX-4100
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#729
Core i5-7440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
98%
#730
Core i5-3350P
MSRP: $189|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i3-4340 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2657M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2657MCore i3-4340
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2657MCore i3-4340
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2657M and Core i3-4340

Intel

Core i7-2657M

The Core i7-2657M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 3,491 points. Launch price was $317.

Intel

Core i3-4340

The Core i3-4340 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,490 points. Launch price was $210.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2657M and Core i3-4340 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Core i7-2657M versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4340 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Core i3-4340 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-2657M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4340 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2657M scores 3,491 against the Core i3-4340's 3,490 — a 0% lead for the Core i7-2657M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 535 vs 1,024, a 62.7% lead for the Core i3-4340 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2657M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4340.

FeatureCore i7-2657MCore i3-4340
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz
3.6 GHz+33%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
3.6 GHz+125%
L3 Cache
4 MB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,491
3,490
Geekbench 6 Single
535
1,024+91%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2657M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4340 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i3-4340 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2657M) and H81,B85,Q85,H87,Q87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4340).

FeatureCore i7-2657MCore i3-4340
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2657M) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-4340). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2657M) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4340) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2657M targets Ultrabook, Core i3-4340 targets Mainstream Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-2657M rivals A6-3420M; Core i3-4340 rivals FX-6350.

FeatureCore i7-2657MCore i3-4340
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook
Mainstream Desktop