Core i7-2677M
VS
A6-9500

Core i7-2677M vs A6-9500

Intel

Core i7-2677M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A6-9500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2677M is positioned at rank 227 and the A6-9500 is on rank 823, so the Core i7-2677M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2677M

#214
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
391%
#215
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
385%
#216
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
354%
#217
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
352%
#218
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
349%
#220
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
337%
#221
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
323%
#222
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
323%
#223
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
314%
#227
Core i7-2677M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16786%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15861%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11516%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3469%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2748%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2404%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1377%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1359%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1237%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1237%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1223%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1190%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1174%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1169%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1158%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
100%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
100%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
100%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
99%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
99%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
99%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
#836
Pentium G870
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#837
Athlon II X2 210e
MSRP: $60|Avg: $28
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9500 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-2677MA6-9500
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-2677M (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-2677MA6-9500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2677M and A6-9500

Intel

Core i7-2677M

The Core i7-2677M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,875 points. Launch price was $317.

AMD

A6-9500

The A6-9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $64.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2677M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the A6-9500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2677M versus 3.8 GHz on the A6-9500 — a 26.9% clock advantage for the A6-9500 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-2677M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A6-9500 uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2677M scores 1,875 against the A6-9500's 1,876 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-9500. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2677M vs 0 kB on the A6-9500.

FeatureCore i7-2677MA6-9500
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz
3.8 GHz+31%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.5 GHz+94%
L3 Cache
4 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1024 kB+100%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark
1,875
1,876
Geekbench 6 Single
562
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2677M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A6-9500 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2677M versus DDR4-2400 on the A6-9500 — the A6-9500 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-9500 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2677M) vs 8 (A6-9500) — the Core i7-2677M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2677M) and AMD AM4 (A6-9500).

FeatureCore i7-2677MA6-9500
Socket
BGA1023
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
64 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2677M) / not specified (A6-9500). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2677M) and AMD Radeon R5 (A6-9500) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2677M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2677M rivals A6-3420M.

FeatureCore i7-2677MA6-9500
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
AMD Radeon R5
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook