Core i7-2677M
VS
Core i3-4030U

Core i7-2677M vs Core i3-4030U

Intel

Core i7-2677M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-4030U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2677M is positioned at rank 227 and the Core i3-4030U is on rank 75, so the Core i3-4030U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2677M

#214
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
391%
#215
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
385%
#216
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
354%
#217
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
352%
#218
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
349%
#220
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
337%
#221
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
323%
#222
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
323%
#223
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
314%
#227
Core i7-2677M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4030U

#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#63
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
235%
#64
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
231%
#65
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
212%
#66
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
211%
#67
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
209%
#69
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
202%
#70
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
194%
#71
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
193%
#72
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
188%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
100%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
97%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-2677M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4030U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2677MCore i3-4030U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2677MCore i3-4030U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2677M and Core i3-4030U

Intel

Core i7-2677M

The Core i7-2677M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,875 points. Launch price was $317.

Intel

Core i3-4030U

The Core i3-4030U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-2677M and Core i3-4030U share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2677M versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4030U — a 41.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-2677M (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i7-2677M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4030U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2677M scores 1,875 against the Core i3-4030U's 1,876 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-4030U. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core i7-2677M vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4030U.

FeatureCore i7-2677MCore i3-4030U
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.9 GHz+53%
1.9 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
1.9 GHz+6%
L3 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,875
1,876
Geekbench 6 Single
562
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2677M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4030U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-2677MCore i3-4030U
Socket
BGA1023
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2677M) / not specified (Core i3-4030U). The Core i7-2677M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i3-4030U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2677M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2677M rivals A6-3420M.

FeatureCore i7-2677MCore i3-4030U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook