Core i7-2715QE
VS
A8-7600

Core i7-2715QE vs A8-7600

Intel

Core i7-2715QE

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A8-7600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-2715QE is positioned at rank 1118 and the A8-7600 is on rank 397, so the A8-7600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2715QE

#1106
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3444%
#1107
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3393%
#1108
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3115%
#1109
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3101%
#1110
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3073%
#1112
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2967%
#1113
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2845%
#1114
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2840%
#1115
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2764%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
100%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
96%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1129
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
96%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-7600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5819%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5498%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3992%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1203%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
953%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
833%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
477%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
471%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
429%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
429%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
424%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
413%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
407%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
405%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
402%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
98%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
98%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
98%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
97%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
97%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
97%
#397
A8-7600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#399
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
99%
#401
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
99%
#409
Core i3-8100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $45
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A8-7600 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2715QE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-2715QEA8-7600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-2715QEA8-7600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2715QE and A8-7600

Intel

Core i7-2715QE

The Core i7-2715QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 3,221 points. Launch price was $378.

AMD

A8-7600

The A8-7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,214 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i7-2715QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the A8-7600's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Core i7-2715QE versus 3.8 GHz on the A8-7600 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the A8-7600 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-2715QE uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A8-7600 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2715QE scores 3,221 against the A8-7600's 3,214 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-2715QE.

FeatureCore i7-2715QEA8-7600
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3 GHz
3.8 GHz+27%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz+48%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
32 nm
28 nm-13%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark
3,221
3,214
Geekbench 6 Single
587
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-2715QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A8-7600 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-2715QE versus 2133 on the A8-7600 — the A8-7600 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-7600 supports up to 64 of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: QM67,HM65 (Core i7-2715QE) and FM2+ (A8-7600).

FeatureCore i7-2715QEA8-7600
Socket
BGA1023
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
2133+71000%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+26214300%
64
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2715QE) vs true (A8-7600). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2715QE) and Radeon R7 Graphics (A8-7600) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2715QE targets Embedded/Industrial. Direct competitor: Core i7-2715QE rivals Embedded R-Series; A8-7600 rivals Core i3-4150.

FeatureCore i7-2715QEA8-7600
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Radeon R7 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Embedded/Industrial