Core i7-2760QM vs Celeron G6900E
Core i7-2760QM
Celeron G6900E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-2760QM is positioned at rank #249 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2760QM
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G6900E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-2760QM | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($53) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-2760QM | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($53) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-2760QM and Celeron G6900E
Core i7-2760QM
The Core i7-2760QM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,313 points. Launch price was $378.
Celeron G6900E
The Celeron G6900E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,272 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i7-2760QM packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Celeron G6900E offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-2760QM has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-2760QM versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G6900E — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-2760QM (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-2760QM uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G6900E uses Alder Lake-S (2022) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-2760QM scores 4,313 against the Celeron G6900E's 4,272 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-2760QM. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-2760QM vs 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900E.
| Feature | Core i7-2760QM | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.5 GHz+17% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz+25% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total)+50% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 32 nm | 10 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| PassMark | 4,313 | 4,272 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,563 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 2,631 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-2760QM uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G6900E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the Core i7-2760QM versus DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900E — the Core i7-2760QM supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G6900E supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-2760QM) vs 20 (Celeron G6900E) — the Celeron G6900E offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i7-2760QM) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Celeron G6900E).
| Feature | Core i7-2760QM | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1600+31900% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 | 128 GB+419430300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i7-2760QM) vs VT-x (Celeron G6900E). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2760QM) and UHD Graphics 710 (Celeron G6900E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i7-2760QM rivals AMD A8-3510MX; Celeron G6900E rivals Pentium Gold G7400.
| Feature | Core i7-2760QM | Celeron G6900E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 3000 | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-2760QM and Celeron G6900E
