Core i7-3612QE
VS
Core i3-7350K

Core i7-3612QE vs Core i3-7350K

Intel

Core i7-3612QE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-7350K

2 Cores4 Thrd60 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3612QE is positioned at rank 1042 and the Core i3-7350K is on rank 636, so the Core i3-7350K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3612QE

#1029
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2536%
#1030
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2499%
#1031
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2294%
#1032
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2283%
#1033
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2263%
#1035
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2185%
#1036
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2095%
#1037
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2092%
#1038
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2035%
#1041
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
100%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
100%
#1043
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1044
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
99%
#1045
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
99%
#1046
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#1047
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
98%
#1048
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#1049
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1050
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1051
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
96%
#1052
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
96%
#1053
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
#1055
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
94%
#1056
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7350K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11418%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10789%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7834%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2360%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1869%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1635%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
937%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
924%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
842%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
842%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
832%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
810%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
798%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
795%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
788%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
100%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
99%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
99%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
99%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
98%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
98%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
98%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
97%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
97%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7350K (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-3612QECore i3-7350K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($45)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-3612QE (2012) relies on 22 nm technology and **unknown Dual-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-3612QECore i3-7350K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+10%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3612QE and Core i3-7350K

Intel

Core i7-3612QE

The Core i7-3612QE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 4,929 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-7350K

The Core i3-7350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,886 points. Launch price was $179.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3612QE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-7350K offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-3612QE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-3612QE versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-7350K — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-7350K (base: 2.1 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-3612QE uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-7350K uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3612QE scores 4,929 against the Core i3-7350K's 4,886 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-3612QE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 640 vs 1,298, a 67.9% lead for the Core i3-7350K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,200 vs 2,740 (21.9% advantage for the Core i3-7350K). L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i7-3612QE vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7350K.

FeatureCore i7-3612QECore i3-7350K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+35%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
4.2 GHz+100%
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,929
4,886
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,100
Geekbench 6 Single
640
1,298+103%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,200
2,740+25%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3612QE uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7350K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3612QE versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7350K — the Core i3-7350K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7350K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM76,QM77 (Core i7-3612QE) and Intel Z270,Intel Z170,Intel H270,Intel B250,Intel Q270,Intel Q250 (Core i3-7350K).

FeatureCore i7-3612QECore i3-7350K
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
64 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3612QE) vs true (Core i3-7350K). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3612QE) and Intel HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7350K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3612QE targets Industrial/Embedded.

FeatureCore i7-3612QECore i3-7350K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Intel HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
Target Use
Industrial/Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-3612QE launched at $426 MSRP, while the Core i3-7350K debuted at $179. At current prices ($50 vs $45), the Core i3-7350K is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3612QE delivers 98.6 pts/$ vs 108.6 pts/$ for the Core i3-7350K — making the Core i3-7350K the 9.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-3612QECore i3-7350K
MSRP
$426
$179-58%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$45-10%
Performance per Dollar
98.6
108.6+10%
Release Date
2012
2017