Core i7-3689Y
VS
Core i3-2375M

Core i7-3689Y vs Core i3-2375M

Intel

Core i7-3689Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i3-2375M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-3689Y is positioned at rank 206 and the Core i3-2375M is on rank 123, so the Core i3-2375M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-3689Y

#194
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
373%
#195
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
367%
#196
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
337%
#197
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
336%
#198
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
333%
#200
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
321%
#201
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
308%
#202
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
308%
#203
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
299%
#206
Core i7-3689Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-2375M

#111
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
297%
#112
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
292%
#113
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
268%
#114
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
267%
#115
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
265%
#117
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
256%
#118
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
245%
#119
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
245%
#120
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
238%
#123
Core i3-2375M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#126
Celeron N4000
MSRP: $107|Avg: $30
99%
#137
N200
MSRP: $193|Avg: N/A
96%
#138
Core 2 Duo SP9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-3689Y leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-2375M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-3689YCore i3-2375M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i7-3689YCore i3-2375M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-3689Y and Core i3-2375M

Intel

Core i7-3689Y

The Core i7-3689Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,967 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-2375M

The Core i3-2375M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 February 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,978 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3689Y and Core i3-2375M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i7-3689Y versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-2375M — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-3689Y (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core i7-3689Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-2375M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3689Y scores 1,967 against the Core i3-2375M's 1,978 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-2375M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 507 vs 238, a 72.2% lead for the Core i7-3689Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-3689Y vs 3 MB on the Core i3-2375M.

FeatureCore i7-3689YCore i3-2375M
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz+73%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,967
1,978
Geekbench 6 Single
507+113%
238
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,100
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the BGA1023 socket with PCIe 3.0. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Core i7-3689Y supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM77,QM77 (Core i7-3689Y) and HM65,HM67,QM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Core i3-2375M).

FeatureCore i7-3689YCore i3-2375M
Socket
BGA1023
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+100%
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3689Y) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i3-2375M). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3689Y) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i3-2375M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3689Y targets Ultra-Low Power Laptop, Core i3-2375M targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3689Y rivals AMD A10-4655M; Core i3-2375M rivals Pentium 997.

FeatureCore i7-3689YCore i3-2375M
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Ultra-Low Power Laptop
Thin & Light Laptop