
Core i7-3770T

N100
Core i7-3770T vs N100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3770T vs N100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3770T vs N100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3770T
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while N100 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike N100.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 41.8 PassMark/$ ($278 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 45W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1155, while N100 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
N100
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 115.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 41.8 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $278 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 45W, a 39W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1155 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3770T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (5,355 vs 5,403).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 8 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3770T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i7-3770T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-3770T better than N100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3770T vs N100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3770T
The Core i7-3770T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 April 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,403 points. Launch price was $330.

N100
The N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 5,355 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-3770T packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the N100's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i7-3770T versus 3.4 GHz on the N100 — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-3770T. The Core i7-3770T is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-3770T scores 5,403 against the N100's 5,355 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-3770T. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total) on the Core i7-3770T vs 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the N100.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+9% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB (total)+33% | 6 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | — |
| PassMark | 5,403 | 5,355 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 850 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,859 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3770T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the N100 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-3770T) / not specified (N100). The Core i7-3770T includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the N100 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3770T was priced at $278, while the N100 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($278 vs $128), N100 was $150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3770T delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 41.8 pts/$ for the N100 — making the N100 the 73.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3770T | N100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $278 | $128-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.4 | 41.8+115% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














