Core i7-3930K vs Core i7-8569U

Intel

Core i7-3930K

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-8569U

4 Cores8 Thrd28 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-3930K vs Core i7-8569U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3930K vs Core i7-8569U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3930K vs Core i7-8569U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3930K

2011

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-8569U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Core i7-8569U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.

Core i7-8569U

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (8,135 vs 8,204).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-8569U better than Core i7-3930K?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-8569U is ahead with a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3930K pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i7-3930K also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3930K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-8569U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-8569U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $583 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-3930K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2011.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-8569U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3930K vs Core i7-8569U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-3930K

The Core i7-3930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,204 points. Launch price was $611.

Intel

Core i7-8569U

The Core i7-8569U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 8,135 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-3930K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i7-8569U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-3930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3930K versus 4.7 GHz on the Core i7-8569U — a 21.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-8569U (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-3930K is built on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-3930K scores 8,204 against the Core i7-8569U's 8,135 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-3930K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-3930K vs 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Core i7-8569U.

FeatureCore i7-3930KCore i7-8569U
Cores / Threads
6 / 12+50%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz+24%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+14%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
PassMark
8,204
8,135
Geekbench 6 Single
731
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3930K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-8569U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-3930KCore i7-8569U
Socket
LGA2011
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
40
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3930K) / not specified (Core i7-8569U). Primary use case: Core i7-3930K targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3930K rivals FX-8350.

FeatureCore i7-3930KCore i7-8569U
Integrated GPU
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
HEDT Desktop