Core i7-3930K vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3930K vs Xeon E3-1240 v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3930K vs Xeon E3-1240 v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3930K

2011

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (8,204 vs 8,258).
❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1240 v5 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌62.5% higher power demand at 130W vs 80W.

Xeon E3-1240 v5

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 130W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1240 v5 better than Core i7-3930K?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1240 v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3930K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1240 v5 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1240 v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1240 v5 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E3-1240 v5 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $583 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-3930K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2011.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1240 v5 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3930K vs Xeon E3-1240 v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3930K

The Core i7-3930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,204 points. Launch price was $611.

Xeon E3-1240 v5

The Xeon E3-1240 v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151, LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 8,258 points. Launch price was $282.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-3930K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-3930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3930K versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon E3-1240 v5 — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1240 v5 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-3930K uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3930K scores 8,204 against the Xeon E3-1240 v5's 8,258 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E3-1240 v5. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-3930K vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1240 v5.

Feature	Core i7-3930K	Xeon E3-1240 v5
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.9 GHz+3%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+9%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)	Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark	8,204	8,258
Geekbench 6 Single	731	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3930K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1240 v5 uses LGA1151, LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3930K	Xeon E3-1240 v5
Socket	LGA2011	LGA1151, LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3930K) / not specified (Xeon E3-1240 v5). Primary use case: Core i7-3930K targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3930K rivals FX-8350.