Core i7-3930K vs Xeon D-1712TR

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3930K vs Xeon D-1712TR FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3930K vs Xeon D-1712TR: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3930K

2011

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $583 MSRP, while Xeon D-1712TR mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌225% higher power demand at 130W vs 40W.

Xeon D-1712TR

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 40W instead of 130W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-3930K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (8,155 vs 8,204).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-3930K better than Xeon D-1712TR?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1712TR makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-3930K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-3930K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-3930K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-3930K is the better buy right now. Core i7-3930K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $583 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1712TR makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-3930K vs Xeon D-1712TR Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3930K

The Core i7-3930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,204 points. Launch price was $611.

Xeon D-1712TR

The Xeon D-1712TR is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 8,155 points. Launch price was $263.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-3930K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon D-1712TR offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-3930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3930K versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-1712TR — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-3930K (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-3930K uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon D-1712TR uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3930K scores 8,204 against the Xeon D-1712TR's 8,155 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i7-3930K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-3930K vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon D-1712TR.

Feature	Core i7-3930K	Xeon D-1712TR
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz+23%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+20%	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	32 nm	10 nm-69%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	8,204	8,155
Geekbench 6 Single	731	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3930K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon D-1712TR uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3930K	Xeon D-1712TR
Socket	LGA2011	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3930K) / not specified (Xeon D-1712TR). Primary use case: Core i7-3930K targets HEDT Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3930K rivals FX-8350.