
Core i7-3930K

Ryzen 5 3600
Core i7-3930K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-3930K vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-3930K vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-3930K
2011Why buy it
- β 66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (8,204 vs 17,685).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 14.1 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($583 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- β100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +52.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Costs $384 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- β Delivers 531.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 14.1 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $583 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βFewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Core i7-3930K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-3930K vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3930K
The Core i7-3930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011β2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,204 points. Launch price was $611.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
Both the Core i7-3930K and Ryzen 5 3600 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-3930K versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 β a 10% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-3930K uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3930K scores 8,204 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 β a 73.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 731 vs 1,295, a 55.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-3930K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i7-3930K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-E (2011β2013) | Matisse (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 8,204 | 17,685+116% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 731 | 1,295+77% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-3930K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i7-3930K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 β the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i7-3930K) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 40 (Core i7-3930K) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) β the Core i7-3930K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X79 (Core i7-3930K) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Core i7-3930K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-3200+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-3930K) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Core i7-3930K targets HEDT Desktop, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-3930K rivals FX-8350; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core i7-3930K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | HEDT Desktop | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-3930K was priced at $583, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($583 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $384 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-3930K delivers 14.1 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 β making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 145.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-3930K | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $583 | $199-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.1 | 88.9+530% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













