Core i7-4600U vs Xeon X5482

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4600U vs Xeon X5482 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4600U vs Xeon X5482: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4600U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon X5482 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,720 vs 2,755).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5482, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌241.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 150W.

Xeon X5482

2007

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 150W instead of 512W, a 362W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon X5482 better than Core i7-4600U?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5482 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4600U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon X5482 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon X5482 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon X5482 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon X5482 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4600U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4600U vs Xeon X5482 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4600U

The Core i7-4600U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,720 points. Launch price was $398.

Xeon X5482

The Xeon X5482 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 2,755 points. Launch price was $1,279.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4600U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon X5482 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon X5482 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4600U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5482 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4600U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4600U uses the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon X5482 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4600U scores 2,720 against the Xeon X5482's 2,755 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon X5482. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4600U vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon X5482.

Feature	Core i7-4600U	Xeon X5482
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.2 GHz+52%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	12 MB L2 Cache+200%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+4167%	6 MB (total)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell-ULT (2013)	Harpertown (2007−2008)
PassMark	2,720	2,755+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4600U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5482 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.