Athlon X4 750 vs Core i7-4600U

AMD

Athlon X4 750

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i7-4600U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i7-4600U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i7-4600U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon X4 750 vs Core i7-4600U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon X4 750

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $95 MSRP, while Core i7-4600U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-4600U

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Athlon X4 750 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (2,720 vs 2,751).
    • 687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Athlon X4 750 better than Core i7-4600U?
    Yes. Athlon X4 750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Athlon X4 750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X4 750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Athlon X4 750 is the better buy right now. Athlon X4 750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $95 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (29.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Athlon X4 750 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Athlon X4 750 vs Core i7-4600U Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Athlon X4 750

    The Athlon X4 750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,751 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Core i7-4600U

    The Core i7-4600U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,720 points. Launch price was $398.

    Processing Power

    The Athlon X4 750 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-4600U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon X4 750 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Athlon X4 750 versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4600U — a 19.2% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 750 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Athlon X4 750 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4600U uses Haswell-ULT (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon X4 750 scores 2,751 against the Core i7-4600U's 2,720 — a 1.1% lead for the Athlon X4 750.

    FeatureAthlon X4 750Core i7-4600U
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    4 GHz+21%
    3.3 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.4 GHz+62%
    2.1 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    4 MB
    256K (per core)+6300%
    Process
    32 nm
    22 nm-31%
    Architecture
    Richland (2013−2014)
    Haswell-ULT (2013)
    PassMark
    2,751+1%
    2,720
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Athlon X4 750 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-4600U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAthlon X4 750Core i7-4600U
    Socket
    FM2
    FCBGA1168
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1866
    Max RAM Capacity
    64 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon X4 750) / not specified (Core i7-4600U). Primary use case: Athlon X4 750 targets Desktop.

    FeatureAthlon X4 750Core i7-4600U
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    Yes
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    Target Use
    Desktop