Core i7-4650U vs Xeon D-1602

Intel

Core i7-4650U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon D-1602

2 Cores4 Thrd27 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-4650U vs Xeon D-1602 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4650U vs Xeon D-1602 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4650U vs Xeon D-1602: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4650U

2013

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 1796.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 27W.

Xeon D-1602

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 27W instead of 512W, a 485W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4650U across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (2,459 vs 2,463).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4650U better than Xeon D-1602?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1602 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4650U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-4650U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.6% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4650U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-4650U still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-4650U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon D-1602 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4650U vs Xeon D-1602 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-4650U

The Core i7-4650U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,463 points. Launch price was $454.

Intel

Xeon D-1602

The Xeon D-1602 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1667. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,459 points. Launch price was $106.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4650U and Xeon D-1602 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i7-4650U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-1602 — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-4650U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-4650U uses the Haswell-ULT (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon D-1602 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4650U scores 2,463 against the Xeon D-1602's 2,459 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i7-4650U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-4650U vs 3 MB on the Xeon D-1602.

FeatureCore i7-4650UXeon D-1602
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
2.5 GHz+47%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+33%
3 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell-ULT (2013)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
2,463
2,459
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4650U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1602 uses FCBGA1667 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4650UXeon D-1602
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1667
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0