Core i7-4820K vs Xeon W3670

Core i7-4820K

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2013

Xeon W3670

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.46 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-4820K

4 / 8

6,515

+1.4%

6,424

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4820K is positioned at rank 800 and the Xeon W3670 is on rank 543, so the Xeon W3670 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4820K

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

15888%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

15012%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

10900%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

3284%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

2601%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

2275%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

1303%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

1286%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

1171%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

1171%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

1158%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

1127%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

1111%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

1106%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

1096%

#294

Core i9-7920X

MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236

100%

#800

Core i7-4820K

MSRP: $332|Avg: $40

100%

#802

Core i7-3770K

MSRP: $332|Avg: $75

100%

#803

Core i5-4460T

MSRP: $187|Avg: $30

99%

#804

Core i3-3220

MSRP: $117|Avg: $88

99%

#805

Core i7-3770T

MSRP: $278|Avg: $105

99%

#807

Pentium G645T

MSRP: $64|Avg: $15

99%

#808

Pentium G620

MSRP: $64|Avg: $12

99%

#809

Core i5-7442EQ

MSRP: $250|Avg: $50

99%

#812

Core i3-3250T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $15

98%

#813

Core i5-5575R

MSRP: $265|Avg: $50

98%

#815

Core i3-3210

MSRP: $117|Avg: $25

97%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W3670

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

8086%

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

1527%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

1356%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

1048%

#332

Xeon W-2235

MSRP: $555|Avg: $350

100%

#333

Xeon Gold 5317

MSRP: $1088|Avg: $1100

98%

#334

Xeon W-2275

MSRP: $1112|Avg: $500

98%

#335

Xeon Gold 6430

MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1850

97%

#336

Xeon Gold 6421N

MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427

97%

#543

Xeon W3670

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

100%

#546

Xeon E3-1240 v2

MSRP: $250|Avg: $150

99%

#547

Xeon E3-1220 v3

MSRP: $203|Avg: $89

99%

#550

Xeon W-2102

MSRP: $202|Avg: $286

98%

#552

Xeon E3-1265L v2

MSRP: $265|Avg: N/A

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($250) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W3670 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.

Insight	Core i7-4820K	Xeon W3670
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($40)	⚠️ Higher cost ($250)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-E (2013) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Gulftown (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4820K ($40), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($210 less, 84% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.

Insight	Core i7-4820K	Xeon W3670
Cost Efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+534%)	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($40)	⚠️ Higher cost ($250)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-4820K Benchmark Check

Xeon W3670 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4820K and Xeon W3670

Core i7-4820K

The Core i7-4820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,515 points. Launch price was $399.

Xeon W3670

The Xeon W3670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Gulftown (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,424 points. Launch price was $295.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4820K packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon W3670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon W3670 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4820K versus 3.46 GHz on the Xeon W3670 — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i7-4820K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4820K uses the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon W3670 uses Gulftown (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4820K scores 6,515 against the Xeon W3670's 6,424 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i7-4820K. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Core i7-4820K vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon W3670.

Feature	Core i7-4820K	Xeon W3670
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+13%	3.46 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+20%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)	Gulftown (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,515+1%	6,424

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4820K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W3670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4820K	Xeon W3670
Socket	LGA2011	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4820K launched at $332 MSRP, while the Xeon W3670 debuted at $250. At current prices ($40 vs $250), the Core i7-4820K is $210 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4820K delivers 162.9 pts/$ vs 25.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W3670 — making the Core i7-4820K the 145.5% better value option.