Core i7-4860EQ
VS
Core i5-4670K

Core i7-4860EQ vs Core i5-4670K

Intel

Core i7-4860EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i5-4670K

4 Cores4 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4860EQ is positioned at rank 1021 and the Core i5-4670K is on rank 865, so the Core i5-4670K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4860EQ

#1009
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2312%
#1010
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2278%
#1011
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2091%
#1012
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2082%
#1013
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2063%
#1015
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1992%
#1016
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1910%
#1017
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1907%
#1018
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1856%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
100%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
99%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
97%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
96%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4670K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18315%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17306%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12565%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3785%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2998%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2623%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1502%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1483%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1350%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1350%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1335%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1299%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1281%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1275%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1264%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
97%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
100%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
100%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
99%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
98%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
97%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
97%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
97%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
96%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
96%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
96%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4670K delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i7-4860EQ in both compute-intensive tasks (1.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i7-4860EQCore i5-4670K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($80)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core i7-4860EQ holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $80 (vs $200), it costs 60% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 147% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i5-4670K.
InsightCore i7-4860EQCore i5-4670K
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+147%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4860EQ and Core i5-4670K

Intel

Core i7-4860EQ

The Core i7-4860EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,508 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i5-4670K

The Core i5-4670K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,584 points. Launch price was $266.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4860EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-4670K's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4860EQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i5-4670K — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4670K (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-4860EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4670K uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4860EQ scores 5,508 against the Core i5-4670K's 5,584 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-4670K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4860EQ vs 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-4670K.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQCore i5-4670K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+89%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6144 kB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
5,508
5,584+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
975
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4860EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4670K uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQCore i5-4670K
Socket
BGA1364
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4860EQ) / VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4670K). The Core i5-4670K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-4860EQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4670K targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4670K rivals FX-9370.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQCore i5-4670K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Gaming Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4860EQ launched at $434 MSRP, while the Core i5-4670K debuted at $328. At current prices ($80 vs $200), the Core i7-4860EQ is $120 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4860EQ delivers 68.8 pts/$ vs 27.9 pts/$ for the Core i5-4670K — making the Core i7-4860EQ the 84.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQCore i5-4670K
MSRP
$434
$328-24%
Avg Price (30d)
$80-60%
$200
Performance per Dollar
68.8+147%
27.9
Release Date
2014
2013