Core i7-4860EQ
VS
Core i7-6822EQ

Core i7-4860EQ vs Core i7-6822EQ

Intel

Core i7-4860EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i7-6822EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4860EQ is positioned at rank 1021 and the Core i7-6822EQ is on rank 818, so the Core i7-6822EQ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4860EQ

#1009
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2312%
#1010
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2278%
#1011
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2091%
#1012
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2082%
#1013
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2063%
#1015
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1992%
#1016
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1910%
#1017
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1907%
#1018
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1856%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
100%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
99%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
97%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
96%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-6822EQ

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16510%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15601%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11327%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3412%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2703%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2365%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1354%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1337%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1217%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1217%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1203%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1171%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1155%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1150%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1139%
#818
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
100%
#819
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
100%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
99%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
98%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
98%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
98%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
98%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
98%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
97%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
97%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
97%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
97%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
97%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-4860EQ leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-6822EQ is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i7-4860EQCore i7-6822EQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($80)
⚠️ Higher cost ($190)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-4860EQ stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 58% cheaper ($80 vs $190) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i7-4860EQCore i7-6822EQ
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+136%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️ Higher cost ($190)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4860EQ and Core i7-6822EQ

Intel

Core i7-4860EQ

The Core i7-4860EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,508 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i7-6822EQ

The Core i7-6822EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4860EQ and Core i7-6822EQ share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4860EQ versus 2 GHz on the Core i7-6822EQ — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-4860EQ. The Core i7-4860EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-6822EQ uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4860EQ scores 5,508 against the Core i7-6822EQ's 5,550 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i7-6822EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4860EQ vs 8 MB on the Core i7-6822EQ.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQCore i7-6822EQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 8
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+60%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark
5,508
5,550
Geekbench 6 Single
684
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,796
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4860EQ) / VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i7-6822EQ). The Core i7-6822EQ includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 530), while the Core i7-4860EQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6822EQ targets Embedded.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQCore i7-6822EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4860EQ launched at $434 MSRP, while the Core i7-6822EQ debuted at $294. At current prices ($80 vs $190), the Core i7-4860EQ is $110 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4860EQ delivers 68.8 pts/$ vs 29.2 pts/$ for the Core i7-6822EQ — making the Core i7-4860EQ the 80.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQCore i7-6822EQ
MSRP
$434
$294-32%
Avg Price (30d)
$80-58%
$190
Performance per Dollar
68.8+136%
29.2
Release Date
2014
2015