Core i7-4860EQ
VS
Opteron 6376

Core i7-4860EQ vs Opteron 6376

Intel

Core i7-4860EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Opteron 6376

16 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4860EQ is positioned at rank 1021 and the Opteron 6376 is on rank 63, so the Opteron 6376 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4860EQ

#1009
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2312%
#1010
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2278%
#1011
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2091%
#1012
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2082%
#1013
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2063%
#1015
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1992%
#1016
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1910%
#1017
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1907%
#1018
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1856%
#1021
Core i7-4860EQ
MSRP: $434|Avg: $80
100%
#1022
Pentium SU2700
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
100%
#1023
A4-1250
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
99%
#1025
Core i5-4200M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1026
Celeron 1000M
MSRP: $86|Avg: N/A
98%
#1028
Celeron B840
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
98%
#1029
Celeron M 743
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
97%
#1030
Core i7-3612QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
96%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 6376

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
1492%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
282%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
250%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
193%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
90%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
86%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
86%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
82%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
82%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
82%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
79%
#63
Opteron 6376
MSRP: $703|Avg: N/A
100%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
79%
#64
Opteron 6328
MSRP: $575|Avg: $42
95%
#65
Opteron 6272
MSRP: $523|Avg: $50
94%
#71
Opteron 6220
MSRP: $523|Avg: $239
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Analysis: Based on specifications, the Opteron 6376 shows stronger theoretical performance metrics.
InsightCore i7-4860EQOpteron 6376
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($80)
⚠️ Higher cost ($703)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Abu Dhabi (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Core i7-4860EQ holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $80 (vs $703), it costs 89% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 769% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Opteron 6376.
InsightCore i7-4860EQOpteron 6376
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+769%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($80)
⚠️ Higher cost ($703)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4860EQ and Opteron 6376

Intel

Core i7-4860EQ

The Core i7-4860EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,508 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Opteron 6376

The Opteron 6376 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,572 points. Launch price was $750.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4860EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6376 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6376 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4860EQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6376 — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-4860EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6376 uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4860EQ scores 5,508 against the Opteron 6376's 5,572 — a 1.2% lead for the Opteron 6376. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQOpteron 6376
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz+28%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
16 MB+6300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Crystalwell (2013−2014)
Abu Dhabi (2012)
PassMark
5,508
5,572+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4860EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6376 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQOpteron 6376
Socket
BGA1364
G34
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4860EQ launched at $434 MSRP, while the Opteron 6376 debuted at $703.

FeatureCore i7-4860EQOpteron 6376
MSRP
$434-38%
$703
Avg Price (30d)
$80
Release Date
2014
2012