Core i7-4860EQ vs Core i5-6600T
Core i7-4860EQ
Core i5-6600T
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4860EQ is positioned at rank 1021 and the Core i5-6600T is on rank 659, so the Core i5-6600T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4860EQ
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-6600T
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-4860EQ | Core i5-6600T |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) | ✅ More affordable ($35) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Crystalwell (2013−2014) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-4860EQ | Core i5-6600T |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+131%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) | ✅ More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4860EQ and Core i5-6600T
Core i7-4860EQ
The Core i7-4860EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,508 points. Launch price was $149.
Core i5-6600T
The Core i5-6600T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 July 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,565 points. Launch price was $192.
Processing Power
The Core i7-4860EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-6600T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-4860EQ versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-6600T — a 9% clock advantage for the Core i5-6600T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-4860EQ uses the Crystalwell (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-6600T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4860EQ scores 5,508 against the Core i5-6600T's 5,565 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-6600T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4860EQ vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-6600T.
| Feature | Core i7-4860EQ | Core i5-6600T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz+50% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB (total)+33% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Crystalwell (2013−2014) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 5,508 | 5,565+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 7,083 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,175 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,212 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-4860EQ uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-6600T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-4860EQ | Core i5-6600T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1364 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4860EQ) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-6600T). The Core i5-6600T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Core i7-4860EQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-6600T targets Office. Direct competitor: Core i5-6600T rivals AMD Athlon II X4 640.
| Feature | Core i7-4860EQ | Core i5-6600T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 530 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Office |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-4860EQ launched at $434 MSRP, while the Core i5-6600T debuted at $213. At current prices ($80 vs $35), the Core i5-6600T is $45 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4860EQ delivers 68.8 pts/$ vs 159.0 pts/$ for the Core i5-6600T — making the Core i5-6600T the 79.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-4860EQ | Core i5-6600T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $434 | $213-51% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $35-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.8 | 159.0+131% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2015 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-4860EQ and Core i5-6600T
