Core i7-4910MQ
VS
Core i3-9300T

Core i7-4910MQ vs Core i3-9300T

Intel

Core i7-4910MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i3-9300T

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-4910MQ is positioned at rank #1053 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4910MQ

#1041
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2655%
#1042
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2616%
#1043
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2402%
#1044
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2391%
#1045
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2369%
#1047
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2288%
#1048
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2194%
#1049
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2190%
#1050
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2131%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
100%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
99%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
98%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
98%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
98%
#1059
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#1060
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
96%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
95%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
95%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-9300T

#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
168%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
161%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
160%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
159%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
148%
#383
Ryzen Threadripper 9980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
139%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
MSRP: $3990|Avg: $2850
137%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
136%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
135%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
131%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
129%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
128%
#390
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $1247
125%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
116%
#392
Celeron G4920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $115
109%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
100%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
69%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
38%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-9300T (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-4910MQCore i3-9300T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($570)
More affordable ($309)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4910MQ (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-4910MQCore i3-9300T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+85%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($570)
More affordable ($309)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4910MQ and Core i3-9300T

Intel

Core i7-4910MQ

The Core i7-4910MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,297 points. Launch price was $568.

Intel

Core i3-9300T

The Core i3-9300T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,323 points. Launch price was $143.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4910MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i3-9300T's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4910MQ versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i3-9300T — a 2.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4910MQ (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-4910MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-9300T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4910MQ scores 6,297 against the Core i3-9300T's 6,323 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-9300T. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4910MQ vs 8 MB on the Core i3-9300T.

FeatureCore i7-4910MQCore i3-9300T
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+3%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
6,297
6,323
Geekbench 6 Single
1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,265
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4910MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-9300T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4910MQCore i3-9300T
Socket
PGA946
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-4910MQ) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-9300T). The Core i3-9300T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Core i7-4910MQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-9300T targets Low Power Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-4910MQCore i3-9300T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4910MQ launched at $570 MSRP, while the Core i3-9300T debuted at $309. At current prices ($570 vs $309), the Core i3-9300T is $261 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4910MQ delivers 11.0 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Core i3-9300T — making the Core i3-9300T the 59.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4910MQCore i3-9300T
MSRP
$570
$309-46%
Avg Price (30d)
$570
$309-46%
Performance per Dollar
11.0
20.5+86%
Release Date
2014
2019