Core i7-4910MQ vs Opteron 6276

Core i7-4910MQ vs Opteron 6276 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-4910MQ

4 / 8

6,297

0.0%

6,348

+0.8%

Ryzen Embedded V1202B

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Athlon Gold 7220U

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4910MQ vs Opteron 6276 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4910MQ vs Opteron 6276: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4910MQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $218 less on MSRP ($570 MSRP vs $788 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 8.1 PassMark/$ ($570 MSRP vs $788 MSRP).
✅Draws 47W instead of 115W, a 68W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,297 vs 6,348).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6276, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.

Opteron 6276

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.1 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($788 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
❌144.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 47W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-4910MQ better than Opteron 6276?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 6276 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4910MQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron 6276 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-4910MQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-4910MQ comes in $218 cheaper on MSRP at $570 MSRP versus $788 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Opteron 6276 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 37.1% better value on MSRP (11.0 vs 8.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-4910MQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-4910MQ vs Opteron 6276 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4910MQ

The Core i7-4910MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,297 points. Launch price was $568.

Opteron 6276

The Opteron 6276 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Interlagos (2011−2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,348 points. Launch price was $119.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-4910MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6276 offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6276 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4910MQ versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron 6276 — a 19.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-4910MQ (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-4910MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 6276 uses Interlagos (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4910MQ scores 6,297 against the Opteron 6276's 6,348 — a 0.8% lead for the Opteron 6276. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4910MQ	Opteron 6276
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	16 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+22%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+26%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (per module)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Interlagos (2011−2012)
PassMark	6,297	6,348

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4910MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6276 uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4910MQ	Opteron 6276
Socket	PGA946	G34
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4910MQ was priced at $570, while the Opteron 6276 came in at $788. On launch pricing ($570 vs $788), Core i7-4910MQ was $218 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4910MQ delivers 11.0 pts/$ vs 8.1 pts/$ for the Opteron 6276 — making the Core i7-4910MQ the 31.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4910MQ	Opteron 6276
MSRP	$570-28%	$788
Performance per Dollar	11.0+36%	8.1
Release Date	2014	2011

Search Core i7-4910MQ on Amazon

Search Opteron 6276 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.