Core i7-4910MQ
VS
Xeon E5-2658

Core i7-4910MQ vs Xeon E5-2658

Intel

Core i7-4910MQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2658

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-4910MQ is positioned at rank 1053 and the Xeon E5-2658 is on rank 699, so the Xeon E5-2658 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4910MQ

#1041
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2655%
#1042
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2616%
#1043
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2402%
#1044
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2391%
#1045
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2369%
#1047
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2288%
#1048
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2194%
#1049
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2190%
#1050
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2131%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
100%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
99%
#1056
Athlon X2 QL-65
MSRP: $150|Avg: $22
98%
#1057
Pentium J2850
MSRP: $94|Avg: $94
98%
#1058
Core i7-4900MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $40
98%
#1059
Celeron P4505
MSRP: $86|Avg: $86
97%
#1060
Pentium Dual Core T2370
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
97%
#1061
Pentium T4200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
96%
#1062
Core i7-2720QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
96%
#1063
Pentium 2020M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
95%
#1064
Celeron P4500
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
95%
#1065
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1066
Processor N50
MSRP: $128|Avg: $120
95%
#1067
Athlon II N350
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
95%
#1068
Celeron N3350
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2658

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
13339%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
97%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2519%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2238%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1729%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
99%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
99%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
98%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
98%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
98%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
98%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
97%
#699
Xeon E5-2658
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#703
Xeon E5-2630
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
99%
#705
Xeon X5680
MSRP: $450|Avg: $13
99%
#708
Pentium 1403 v2
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($400) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2658 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-4910MQXeon E5-2658
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($570)
More affordable ($400)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-4910MQ ($570), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($170 less, 43% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-4910MQXeon E5-2658
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+41%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($570)
More affordable ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-4910MQ and Xeon E5-2658

Intel

Core i7-4910MQ

The Core i7-4910MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,297 points. Launch price was $568.

Intel

Xeon E5-2658

The Xeon E5-2658 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,232 points. Launch price was $1,462.

Processing Power

The Core i7-4910MQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4910MQ versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-4910MQ (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-4910MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4910MQ scores 6,297 against the Xeon E5-2658's 6,232 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-4910MQ. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4910MQ vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658.

FeatureCore i7-4910MQXeon E5-2658
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz+63%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.9 GHz+38%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
20480 kB (total)+150%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
6,297+1%
6,232
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4910MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2658 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-4910MQXeon E5-2658
Socket
PGA946
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-4910MQ launched at $570 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2658 debuted at $400. At current prices ($570 vs $400), the Xeon E5-2658 is $170 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4910MQ delivers 11.0 pts/$ vs 15.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2658 — making the Xeon E5-2658 the 34% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-4910MQXeon E5-2658
MSRP
$570
$400-30%
Avg Price (30d)
$570
$400-30%
Performance per Dollar
11.0
15.6+42%
Release Date
2014
2012