Core i7-4910MQ vs Xeon E3-1268L v5

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-4910MQ vs Xeon E3-1268L v5 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-4910MQ vs Xeon E3-1268L v5: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-4910MQ

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.1% higher average FPS across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,297 vs 6,334).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 16.8 PassMark/$ ($570 MSRP vs $377 MSRP).
❌34.3% higher power demand at 47W vs 35W.

Xeon E3-1268L v5

2015

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $193 less on MSRP ($377 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.8 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($377 MSRP vs $570 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 47W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-4910MQ across 9 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1268L v5 better than Core i7-4910MQ?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1268L v5 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-4910MQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1268L v5 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1268L v5 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1268L v5 comes in $193 cheaper on MSRP at $377 MSRP versus $570 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-4910MQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.1% average FPS lead across 9 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 52.1% better value on MSRP (16.8 vs 11.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1268L v5 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-4910MQ vs Xeon E3-1268L v5 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-4910MQ

The Core i7-4910MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,297 points. Launch price was $568.

Xeon E3-1268L v5

The Xeon E3-1268L v5 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,334 points. Launch price was $377.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-4910MQ and Xeon E3-1268L v5 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4910MQ versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1268L v5 — a 13.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-4910MQ (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core i7-4910MQ uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 uses Skylake-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-4910MQ scores 6,297 against the Xeon E3-1268L v5's 6,334 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E3-1268L v5. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-4910MQ	Xeon E3-1268L v5
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+15%	3.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+21%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Skylake-DT (2015)
PassMark	6,297	6,334

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-4910MQ uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-4910MQ	Xeon E3-1268L v5
Socket	PGA946	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-4910MQ was priced at $570, while the Xeon E3-1268L v5 came in at $377. On launch pricing ($570 vs $377), Xeon E3-1268L v5 was $193 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-4910MQ delivers 11.0 pts/$ vs 16.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1268L v5 — making the Xeon E3-1268L v5 the 41.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-4910MQ	Xeon E3-1268L v5
MSRP	$570	$377-34%
Performance per Dollar	11.0	16.8+53%
Release Date	2014	2015

Search Core i7-4910MQ on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1268L v5 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.