
Core i7-5820K

Xeon Bronze 3408U
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon Bronze 3408U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon Bronze 3408U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon Bronze 3408U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-5820K
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Bronze 3408U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,826 vs 9,969).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 23 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Bronze 3408U, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $389 MSRP, while Xeon Bronze 3408U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Bronze 3408U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (23 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 140W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Bronze 3408U better than Core i7-5820K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon Bronze 3408U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5820K
The Core i7-5820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,826 points. Launch price was $410.

Xeon Bronze 3408U
The Xeon Bronze 3408U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 9,969 points. Launch price was $425.
Processing Power
The Core i7-5820K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Bronze 3408U offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon Bronze 3408U has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-5820K versus 1.9 GHz on the Xeon Bronze 3408U — a 61.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-5820K (base: 3.3 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-5820K uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon Bronze 3408U uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5820K scores 9,826 against the Xeon Bronze 3408U's 9,969 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon Bronze 3408U. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-5820K vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon Bronze 3408U.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon Bronze 3408U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz+89% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+83% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total) | 22.5 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 22 nm | Intel 7 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell-E (2014) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 9,826 | 9,969+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,134 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,383 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-5820K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Bronze 3408U uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon Bronze 3408U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-5820K) / not specified (Xeon Bronze 3408U). Primary use case: Core i7-5820K targets Enthusiast Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-5820K rivals Ryzen 5 1600.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon Bronze 3408U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Workstation | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













