Core i7-5820K
VS
Xeon E5-2650 v2

Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E5-2650 v2

Intel

Core i7-5820K

6 Cores12 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-5820K is positioned at rank 686 and the Xeon E5-2650 v2 is on rank 272, so the Xeon E5-2650 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-5820K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12340%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11660%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8466%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2551%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2020%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1767%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1012%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
999%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
910%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
910%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
899%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
875%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
863%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
859%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
852%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
100%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
98%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
98%
#692
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
98%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
98%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
97%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
96%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
4243%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
801%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
712%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
550%
#221
Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP: $2977|Avg: N/A
100%
#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
100%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
99%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
98%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
97%
#272
Xeon E5-2650 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#283
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
MSRP: $189|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2650 v2
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($103)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-E (2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-5820K ($103), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($103 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2650 v2
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($103)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-5820K and Xeon E5-2650 v2

Intel

Core i7-5820K

The Core i7-5820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,826 points. Launch price was $410.

Intel

Xeon E5-2650 v2

The Xeon E5-2650 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,795 points. Launch price was $650.

Processing Power

The Core i7-5820K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-5820K versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-5820K (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-5820K uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5820K scores 9,826 against the Xeon E5-2650 v2's 9,795 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-5820K. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-5820K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v2.

FeatureCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2650 v2
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz+6%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+27%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell-E (2014)
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark
9,826
9,795
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,700
Geekbench 6 Single
1,134
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,383
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-5820K versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2650 v2 — the Core i7-5820K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i7-5820K) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v2) — the Xeon E5-2650 v2 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99 (Core i7-5820K) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2650 v2).

FeatureCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2650 v2
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133+33%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
768 GB+1100%
RAM Channels
4
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
40+43%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-5820K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2650 v2). Primary use case: Core i7-5820K targets Enthusiast Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-5820K rivals Ryzen 5 1600.

FeatureCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2650 v2
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Enthusiast Workstation