Core i7-5820K
VS
Xeon E5-2689

Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E5-2689

Intel

Core i7-5820K

6 Cores12 Thrd140 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2689

8 Cores16 Thrd115 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-5820K is positioned at rank 686 and the Xeon E5-2689 is on rank 979, so the Core i7-5820K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-5820K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12340%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11660%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8466%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2551%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2020%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1767%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1012%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
999%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
910%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
910%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
899%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
875%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
863%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
859%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
852%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
100%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
100%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
98%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
98%
#691
Core i7-6800K
MSRP: $434|Avg: $120
98%
#692
Core i7-3770S
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#693
Core i5-4670S
MSRP: $213|Avg: $30
98%
#694
Core i5-3550
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
98%
#695
Core i3-7300
MSRP: $184|Avg: $46
97%
#696
FX-4300
MSRP: $122|Avg: $25
97%
#697
Core i5-3450
MSRP: $184|Avg: $95
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
97%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
96%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2689

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
37717%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
7121%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
6327%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4888%
#979
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
100%
#980
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
99%
#981
Xeon X3480
MSRP: $612|Avg: $48
99%
#982
Xeon E5-2687W
MSRP: $1885|Avg: $70
97%
#983
Xeon E5-4610
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $50
96%
#985
Xeon X7550
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $1400
95%
#986
Xeon E7540
MSRP: $1980|Avg: $146
95%
#987
Xeon E7530
MSRP: $1391|Avg: $146
94%
#988
Xeon E5-4627 v4
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $200
94%
#989
Xeon E5-4627 v3
MSRP: $2225|Avg: $200
93%
#990
Xeon X5660
MSRP: $1219|Avg: $10
89%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
87%
#992
Xeon E5-2690
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
86%
#993
Xeon E3-1565L v5
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $120
86%
#994
Xeon L5640
MSRP: $996|Avg: N/A
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($18) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2689 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2689
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($103)
More affordable ($18)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-E (2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-5820K ($103), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($85 less, 472% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2689
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+478%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($103)
More affordable ($18)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-5820K and Xeon E5-2689

Intel

Core i7-5820K

The Core i7-5820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,826 points. Launch price was $410.

Intel

Xeon E5-2689

The Xeon E5-2689 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,922 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Core i7-5820K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2689 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2689 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-5820K versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-5820K uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2689 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5820K scores 9,826 against the Xeon E5-2689's 9,922 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2689. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-5820K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2689.

FeatureCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2689
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+27%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
15 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell-E (2014)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
9,826
9,922
Cinebench R23 Multi
5,700
Geekbench 6 Single
1,134
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,383
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2689
Socket
LGA2011
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-5820K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2689). Primary use case: Core i7-5820K targets Enthusiast Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-5820K rivals Ryzen 5 1600.

FeatureCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2689
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes
Target Use
Enthusiast Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-5820K launched at $389 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2689 debuted at $1800. At current prices ($103 vs $18), the Xeon E5-2689 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-5820K delivers 95.4 pts/$ vs 551.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2689 — making the Xeon E5-2689 the 141% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-5820KXeon E5-2689
MSRP
$389-78%
$1800
Avg Price (30d)
$103
$18-83%
Performance per Dollar
95.4
551.2+478%
Release Date
2014
2012