
Core i7-5820K

Xeon E5-2689
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E5-2689 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E5-2689 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E5-2689: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-5820K
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,411 less on MSRP ($389 MSRP vs $1,800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 358.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 25.3 vs 5.5 PassMark/$ ($389 MSRP vs $1,800 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,826 vs 9,922).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2689, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌21.7% higher power demand at 140W vs 115W.
Xeon E5-2689
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 140W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($1,800 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2689 better than Core i7-5820K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E5-2689 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5820K
The Core i7-5820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,826 points. Launch price was $410.

Xeon E5-2689
The Xeon E5-2689 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,922 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-5820K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2689 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2689 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-5820K versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2689 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-5820K uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2689 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5820K scores 9,826 against the Xeon E5-2689's 9,922 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2689. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-5820K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2689.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon E5-2689 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+27% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-E (2014) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| PassMark | 9,826 | 9,922 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,134 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,383 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon E5-2689 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-5820K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2689). Primary use case: Core i7-5820K targets Enthusiast Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-5820K rivals Ryzen 5 1600.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon E5-2689 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-5820K was priced at $389, while the Xeon E5-2689 came in at $1800. On launch pricing ($389 vs $1800), Core i7-5820K was $1411 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-5820K delivers 25.3 pts/$ vs 5.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2689 — making the Core i7-5820K the 128.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon E5-2689 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $389-78% | $1800 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3+360% | 5.5 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














