
Core i7-5820K

Xeon E-2234
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E-2234 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E-2234 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E-2234: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-5820K
2014Why buy it
- ✅+1.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2234 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.3 vs 38.6 PassMark/$ ($389 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌97.2% higher power demand at 140W vs 71W.
Xeon E-2234
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $139 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 52.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.6 vs 25.3 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $389 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 71W instead of 140W, a 69W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,639 vs 9,826).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2234 better than Core i7-5820K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-5820K vs Xeon E-2234 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-5820K
The Core i7-5820K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-E (2014) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,826 points. Launch price was $410.

Xeon E-2234
The Xeon E-2234 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 71 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,639 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Core i7-5820K packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2234 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-5820K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Core i7-5820K versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon E-2234 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2234 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-5820K uses the Haswell-E (2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E-2234 uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-5820K scores 9,826 against the Xeon E-2234's 9,639 — a 1.9% lead for the Core i7-5820K. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Core i7-5820K vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2234.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon E-2234 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz+33% |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 15 MB (total)+88% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-E (2014) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,826+2% | 9,639 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 5,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,134 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,383 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-5820K uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2234 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon E-2234 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 4 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i7-5820K) / not specified (Xeon E-2234). Primary use case: Core i7-5820K targets Enthusiast Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-5820K rivals Ryzen 5 1600.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon E-2234 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
| Target Use | Enthusiast Workstation | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-5820K was priced at $389, while the Xeon E-2234 came in at $250. On launch pricing ($389 vs $250), Xeon E-2234 was $139 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-5820K delivers 25.3 pts/$ vs 38.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E-2234 — making the Xeon E-2234 the 41.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-5820K | Xeon E-2234 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $389 | $250-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3 | 38.6+53% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














