Core i7-620LM
VS
Core i5-13400F

Core i7-620LM vs Core i5-13400F

Intel

Core i7-620LM

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core i5-13400F

10 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-620LM is positioned at rank #1208 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-620LM

#1196
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
6012%
#1197
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5924%
#1198
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
5439%
#1199
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
5414%
#1200
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
5364%
#1202
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
5180%
#1203
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4967%
#1204
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4959%
#1205
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4826%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
100%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
100%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
98%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
97%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
95%
#1216
Core 2 Quad Q9000
MSRP: $348|Avg: $15
94%
#1217
Core i5-2537M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
94%
#1218
Core i7-720QM
MSRP: $364|Avg: N/A
93%
#1219
Pentium U5400
MSRP: $289|Avg: $214
91%
#1220
Pentium T2330
MSRP: $150|Avg: $7
91%
#1221
Z-01
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
#1222
Pentium T2310
MSRP: $150|Avg: $14
85%
#1223
Celeron SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F

#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
107%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
107%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
106%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
106%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
105%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
105%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
104%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
104%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
104%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
76%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
104%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
103%
#77
Ryzen 9 5900XT
MSRP: $349|Avg: $311
102%
#78
Core i5-12500
MSRP: $212|Avg: $140
101%
#79
Core i5-14600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $275
101%
#80
Ryzen 7 7700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $246
101%
#81
Core i5-13400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $180
100%
#82
Core i3-12100T
MSRP: $125|Avg: $90
100%
#83
Core i7-11700F
MSRP: $298|Avg: $150
100%
#84
Core i3-10105F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $65
99%
#85
Core i5-9400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
98%
#86
Core i7-12700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $250
98%
#87
Core i5-12490F
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#88
Ryzen 5 5600GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $150
97%
#89
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#90
Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G
MSRP: $300|Avg: $180
97%
#91
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
96%
#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
96%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
94%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
94%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-13400F (2023) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-620LMCore i5-13400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($180)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-620LM (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-620LMCore i5-13400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2751%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-620LM and Core i5-13400F

Intel

Core i7-620LM

The Core i7-620LM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,463 points. Launch price was $300.

Intel

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

Processing Power

The Core i7-620LM packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Core i7-620LM versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 48.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-620LM uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-620LM scores 1,463 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 177.9% lead for the Core i5-13400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 2,407, a 137% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 900 vs 11,408 (170.8% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-620LM vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

FeatureCore i7-620LMCore i5-13400F
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
10 / 16+400%
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
4.6 GHz+64%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
20 MB (total)+400%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process
32 nm
Intel 7 nm-78%
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
1,463
25,029+1611%
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,211
Geekbench 6 Single
450
2,407+435%
Geekbench 6 Multi
900
11,408+1168%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-620LM uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i7-620LM versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-620LM) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: QM57,HM55 (Core i7-620LM) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

FeatureCore i7-620LMCore i5-13400F
Socket
BGA1288
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+67%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
192 GB+2300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-620LM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-620LM targets Budget, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-620LM rivals Ryzen 5 3500U; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

FeatureCore i7-620LMCore i5-13400F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-620LM launched at $300 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196.

FeatureCore i7-620LMCore i5-13400F
MSRP
$300
$196-35%
Avg Price (30d)
$180
Release Date
2010
2023