
Core i7-640M

Ryzen 7 3700X
Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-640M
2010Why buy it
- β Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,092 vs 22,430).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +412.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- β 50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Core i7-640M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-640M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Core i7-640M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-640M vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-640M
The Core i7-640M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010β2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $346.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Core i7-640M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-640M versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 23.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-640M uses the Arrandale (2010β2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-640M scores 2,092 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 165.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-640M vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Core i7-640M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 8 / 16+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.46 GHz | 4.4 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 32 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010β2011) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 2,092 | 22,430+972% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-640M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1066 on the Core i7-640M versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 200.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-640M) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) β the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i7-640M) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Core i7-640M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | 1066 | DDR4-3200+200% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 128 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Core i7-640M) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Core i7-640M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i7-640M rivals Core 2 Duo T9600.
| Feature | Core i7-640M | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | true | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













