3015Ce vs Core i7-640M

3015Ce vs Core i7-640M Performance Spectrum

3015Ce

2 / 4

2,099

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-640M

2 / 4

2,092

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

3015Ce vs Core i7-640M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

3015Ce vs Core i7-640M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

3015Ce

2020

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $150 MSRP, while Core i7-640M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i7-640M

2010

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,092 vs 2,099).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is 3015Ce better than Core i7-640M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-640M is ahead with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, 3015Ce pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, 3015Ce is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

3015Ce is the better buy right now. 3015Ce comes in at an unclear MSRP at $150 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-640M is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (14.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

3015Ce makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

3015Ce vs Core i7-640M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

3015Ce

The 3015Ce is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FT5. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,099 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i7-640M

The Core i7-640M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $346.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the 3015Ce and Core i7-640M share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the 3015Ce versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-640M — a 40.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-640M (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The 3015Ce uses the Pollock (Zen) (2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i7-640M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the 3015Ce scores 2,099 against the Core i7-640M's 2,092 — a 0.3% lead for the 3015Ce. L3 cache: 4 MB on the 3015Ce vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-640M.

Feature	3015Ce	Core i7-640M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	3.46 GHz+50%
Base Clock	1.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+133%
L3 Cache	4 MB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Pollock (Zen) (2020)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,099	2,092

🧠

Memory & Platform

The 3015Ce uses the FT5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-640M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1600 on the 3015Ce versus 1066 on the Core i7-640M — the 3015Ce supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The 3015Ce supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (3015Ce) vs 2 (Core i7-640M). PCIe lanes: 8 (3015Ce) vs 16 (Core i7-640M) — the Core i7-640M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP5 (3015Ce) and HM55,HM57,QM57 (Core i7-640M).

Feature	3015Ce	Core i7-640M
Socket	FT5	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	1600+50%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	16+100%	8
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	16+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (2-Core) (3015Ce) and Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) (Core i7-640M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: 3015Ce rivals Celeron N4020; Core i7-640M rivals Core 2 Duo T9600.