PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon X5670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon X5670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700TE

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while Xeon X5670 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5670, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).

Xeon X5670

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Costs $236 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅Delivers 349.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($67 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,160 vs 6,203).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6700TE better than Xeon X5670?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-6700TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-6700TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6700TE is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X5670 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i7-6700TE comes in 352.2% more expensive on MSRP at $303 MSRP versus $67 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon X5670 is also 349.1% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 20.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6700TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6700TE vs Xeon X5670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700TE

The Core i7-6700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,203 points. Launch price was $303.

Xeon X5670

The Xeon X5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,160 points. Launch price was $67.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700TE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon X5670 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6700TE versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5670 — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-6700TE (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Core i7-6700TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon X5670 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700TE scores 6,203 against the Xeon X5670's 6,160 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i7-6700TE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-6700TE vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5670.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon X5670
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+2%	3.33 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.93 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,203	6,160
Geekbench 6 Single	914	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-6700TE versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5670 — the Core i7-6700TE supports 60% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-6700TE) vs 3 (Xeon X5670). Chipset compatibility: 100-series (Core i7-6700TE) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5670).

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon X5670
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+60%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. The Core i7-6700TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the Xeon X5670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700TE targets Gaming, Xeon X5670 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-6700TE rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon X5670 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon X5670
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700TE was priced at $303, while the Xeon X5670 came in at $67. On launch pricing ($303 vs $67), Xeon X5670 was $236 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700TE delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 91.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X5670 — making the Xeon X5670 the 127.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	Xeon X5670
MSRP	$303	$67-78%
Performance per Dollar	20.5	91.9+348%
Release Date	2015	2010

Search Core i7-6700TE on Amazon

Search Xeon X5670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.