Core i7-7820EQ vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Core i7-7820EQ
Popular choices:
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core i7-7820EQ is positioned at rank #889 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7820EQ
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-7820EQ | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($378) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($486) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-7820EQ | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+549%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($378) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($486) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7820EQ and Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Core i7-7820EQ
The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,323 points. Launch price was $699.
Processing Power
The Core i7-7820EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 7950X3D has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ versus 5.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 59.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. The Core i7-7820EQ uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820EQ scores 7,470 against the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's 62,323 — a 157.2% lead for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7950X3D.
| Feature | Core i7-7820EQ | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 16 / 32+300% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 5.7 GHz+84% |
| Base Clock | — | 4.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 128 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 7,470 | 62,323+734% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,581 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,926 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,643 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-7820EQ) / true (Ryzen 9 7950X3D). The Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i7-7820EQ requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7950X3D rivals Core i9-13900K.
| Feature | Core i7-7820EQ | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-7820EQ launched at $378 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 7950X3D debuted at $699. At current prices ($378 vs $486), the Core i7-7820EQ is $108 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7820EQ delivers 19.8 pts/$ vs 128.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 7950X3D — making the Ryzen 9 7950X3D the 146.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-7820EQ | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $378-46% | $699 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $378-22% | $486 |
| Performance per Dollar | 19.8 | 128.2+547% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-7820EQ and Ryzen 9 7950X3D
