Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200GE

Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200GE Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7820HQ

4 / 8

7,184

0.0%

7,192

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200GE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200GE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7820HQ

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,184 vs 7,192).
❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 3 3200GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 3 3200GE

2019

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Core i7-7820HQ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7820HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $85 MSRP, while Core i7-7820HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 3 3200GE better than Core i7-7820HQ?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7820HQ is ahead with a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3200GE pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i7-7820HQ also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 3 3200GE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 3 3200GE is the better buy right now. Ryzen 3 3200GE comes in at an unclear MSRP at $85 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i7-7820HQ is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 19.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (84.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 3200GE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200GE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7820HQ

The Core i7-7820HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,184 points. Launch price was $378.

Ryzen 3 3200GE

The Ryzen 3 3200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,192 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7820HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 3200GE's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7820HQ versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 3200GE — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 3 3200GE (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-7820HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 3200GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820HQ scores 7,184 against the Ryzen 3 3200GE's 7,192 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 3 3200GE. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820HQ vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 3200GE.

Feature	Core i7-7820HQ	Ryzen 3 3200GE
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz	4 GHz+3%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.3 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)+100%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Kaby Lake-H (2017)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	7,184	7,192

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7820HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 3200GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-7820HQ	Ryzen 3 3200GE
Socket	BGA1440	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	No
PCIe Lanes	—	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i7-7820HQ) / AMD-V (Ryzen 3 3200GE). The Ryzen 3 3200GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Core i7-7820HQ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 3 3200GE targets Desktop Low Power.