Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E3-1285 v3

Intel

Core i7-7820HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1285 v3

4 Cores8 Thrd84 WWMax: 4 GHz2013

Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E3-1285 v3 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E3-1285 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E3-1285 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7820HQ

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Draws 45W instead of 84W, a 39W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (7,184 vs 7,211).

Xeon E3-1285 v3

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌86.7% higher power demand at 84W vs 45W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Xeon E3-1285 v3 better than Core i7-7820HQ?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1285 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7820HQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Xeon E3-1285 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1285 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Xeon E3-1285 v3 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E3-1285 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i7-7820HQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E3-1285 v3 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-7820HQ

    The Core i7-7820HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,184 points. Launch price was $378.

    Intel

    Xeon E3-1285 v3

    The Xeon E3-1285 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013βˆ’2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 84 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,211 points. Launch price was $800.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    Both the Core i7-7820HQ and Xeon E3-1285 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7820HQ versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1285 v3 β€” a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1285 v3 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-7820HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1285 v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013βˆ’2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820HQ scores 7,184 against the Xeon E3-1285 v3's 7,211 β€” a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1285 v3. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-7820HQ vs 8192 kB (total) on the Xeon E3-1285 v3.

    FeatureCore i7-7820HQXeon E3-1285 v3
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 8
    4 / 8
    Boost Clock
    3.9 GHz
    4 GHz+3%
    Base Clock
    2.9 GHz
    3.6 GHz+24%
    L3 Cache
    8 MB (total)
    8192 kB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    14 nm-36%
    22 nm
    Architecture
    Kaby Lake-H (2017)
    Haswell-WS (2013βˆ’2014)
    PassMark
    7,184
    7,211
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-7820HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1285 v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-7820HQXeon E3-1285 v3
    Socket
    BGA1440
    LGA1150
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 5.0+67%