Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-7820HQ

4 / 8

7,184

+1.1%

7,106

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7820HQ

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-7820HQ across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,106 vs 7,184).
❌Launch MSRP is still $110 MSRP, while Core i7-7820HQ mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7820HQ better than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300?

Yes. Core i7-7820HQ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-7820HQ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820HQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7820HQ is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-7820HQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $110 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. At roughly 7,106 PassMark with 4 cores and 4 threads, it only really makes sense as a bare-minimum stopgap or a very constrained existing-platform upgrade.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i7-7820HQ vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7820HQ

The Core i7-7820HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,184 points. Launch price was $378.

Ryzen 3 PRO 1300

The Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 7,106 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-7820HQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-7820HQ versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 — a 10.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7820HQ (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-7820HQ uses the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820HQ scores 7,184 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300's 7,106 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-7820HQ. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-7820HQ	Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+11%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake-H (2017)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	7,184+1%	7,106

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-7820HQ uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.